Janet Jackson's energizer bunny tit
(it keeps going and going)
Guest column by Johnny the
C.
This year's Superbowl was one of the most closely contested
battles in the 38 years of the game's existence -- great defense,
exciting special teams, and fantastic second-half offense. The champion
New England Patriots and surprisingly gutsy Carolina Panthers (read:
losers) provided what should have been a long-remembered Superbowl.
The previous year's contest between the champion Tampa Bay Buccaneers
and the losing Oakland Raiders was remembered throughout the next year
for the Buc's total domination and the Raiders' complete ineptitude.
Ten days after this year's epic contest, no one outside of Boston can
tell you anything about the game. All anyone can remember is that
Justin Timberlake exposed Janet Jackson's right breast.
In an escalating climate of hype, we've been treated to images of
Michael Jackson sleepovers, the slutification of Christina Aguilera,
and the Brittney Spears spit-swap with aging diva Madonna. Janet felt
she had to raise the bar a little to make an impression.
"Hmmm, I wonder if a deep soul kiss with Justin would be believable?"
she might have pondered. Remembering that America was sickened by her
brother's kiss with Elvis's spawn (because Michael is neither human nor
heterosexual) Janet wisely discarded the tongue tango with Justin. And
even though Justin has allegedly slept with Brittney, Christina, and
Cameron Diaz, most of America believes that this boy-band popster is
only marginally more masculine than Michael Jackson.
Janet's next thought might have been, "Okay, Michael failed in his
public kiss, but all of America believes he has had sexual relations
with little boys. What if I have sex with a little boy? No, not enough
time. How about if I get a boy to feel me up and expose one of my
breasts? Perfect. And while Justin isn't masculine enough for a
believable kiss, he's a perfect fit in
the-little-boy-who-gets-to-play-with-a-Jackson scenario. I hope people
don't think it is too derivative, though. If they do, I'll just tell
people it was meant as an homage."
I was watching the Superbowl on a little television in Deerfield Beach,
Florida when the halftime festivities commenced. MTV -- aka More Tit
Vision -- produced the half-time extravaganza, which featured Nelly
grabbing his penis through his trouser fabric while singing, "It's
getting hot in here," as well as obligatory outerwear shedding by a
talented female dance troop, and Kid Rock wearing a ripped, tattered,
and cut American flag as a poncho. Appetizer and first course. The main
course was the "costume reveal" (Janet) or "costume malfunction"
(Justin) that led to the exposing of Janet Jackson's right breast.
Now I have to be honest, the television was small, the exposure was
brief, and the lighting was meant for stage, so I wasn't even sure I
really saw what I thought I saw. "Did I just see tit?!"
It seemed too white to me. Perhaps Janet wore a tit-shaped prosthetic
over her real tit, I thought. I just couldn't be sure. Why couldn't I
be watching the show from my own house in California on my wide screen
rear projection high definition television? Damn you fate! Damn you Gay
Freddy!
I couldn't get a reality check, as the announcers assiduously refrained
from any commentary regarding the half-time show. I wondered if anyone
else saw what I thought I had seen. Was I crazy? I've always admired
Janet's breasts in her music videos. I've often thought that I would
like to get together with her for a hard fucking (not that she would
want to get together with me, but it's my fantasy). Were my erotic
thoughts affecting my view of "reality?" I just didn't know.
After the game, I watched the first installment of All Star Survivor.
(Sidebar: Jasper called me the other day after watching Survivor for
the first time to ask me if Sue Hawk looked as skanky when we met her
in Reno as she does on TV. I assured him that while he was looking
through 12 oz glasses, Hawk benefited from nice clothing, soap,
shampoo, and make up -- she looks fine in "real" life.)
After Survivor (no Hawk tit, unfortunately) I scanned the local news
and saw the reports about Janet's breast exposure. Damn you digitizers!
In the next few days, I didn't see Janet's breast over 100 times. I did
see fuzzy series of randomized digital blocks or a fuzzy diffused
circle where her breast would have been.
While in Florida, I had no easy access to the Internet, so I continued
to feel the void that comes from not enjoying a clear view of tit. A
desire was growing into a need. I did hear about horror, shock,
inappropriateness, and condemnation stemming from a bared breast on
television show after television show.
What?!
Charge: Janet engaged in a marketing ploy.
Consider: The Superbowl itself is an incredibly successful
marketing ploy by the NFL. Time will tell whether Janet is as
successful with her marketing ploy.
Charge: Janet made a sexual object of herself at the
Superbowl.
Consider: The NFL made sexual objects of women a long time
ago when they created and marketed the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders for
male American consumption. I want my son to grow up and be an Oakland
Raider, since that's the highest aspiration a male can achieve. If I
had a daughter, I would hope she would become an Oakland Raiderette,
since that's the highest aspiration a female can achieve
Charge: The breast baring occurred on one of the most
holy of American family-oriented television events.
Consider: The Superbowl is the cause of more illegal
betting than any other single event in America.
Charge: Janet's breast is offensive.
Consider: Bullshit. Janet's breast is wonderful. It is a
relief that not all of the Jackson family plastic surgery ends in
horrible disfigurement. Janet even adorned her nipple with an amazing
piece of artistic jewelry. If Justin had ripped off his own shirt and
exposed both of his nipples, no one would have commented. As a hetero
male, I find women's exposed breasts superior to men's exposed breasts.
There is nothing inherently offensive about breasts.
Charge: "What about the children?"
Consider: I would prefer that my six-year-old son view
Janet's tit than spend a night with Michael at Neverland Ranch. Or even
a night at Justin's crib.
The most hypocritical aspect? Television folks feigning umbrage as they
showed the digitized clips of the reveal over and over and over. I
wasn't sure I had even seen tit, but by the time the
sexually-repressed, ultra-conservative tit nazis were done (naw,
they're not done yet) they made certain that I, my son, you, and your
extended family knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that tit had flashed on
the small screen -- for they flashed it over and over and over. This
tit keeps going, and going, and going.
Critical review: Janet's tit looks nice, but it definitely needs
support. The jewelry is incredible. Lovely, really. An amazing sunburst
spread across her nipple, held in place by a fastening bar piercing.
Where I once wondered what Janet's breast would look like, now I wonder
about other possible body piercings -- Labia? Clit? Both?
Oh, Miss Jackson. I do declare.
* * *
STANDARD DISCLAIMER: This column aims to be funny. If you can
read anything else into it, you're on your own. Copyright 2004 by Mike
Jasper.
|